LINDSAY STOETZEL, PHD
  • Home
  • Research
    • Teachology 101
    • Technology Showcase
  • Teaching
    • Elementary Education >
      • EDLA 261: Foundations of Literacy
      • EDUC 420: Teaching Elementary Reading (PK-3)
      • C&I 369: Teaching ELA
      • C&I 309: Literacy Across the Curriculum
      • C&I 463: Student Teaching Seminar
      • C&I 373: Practicum III
      • C&I 367: Practicum I
    • Secondary Education >
      • English 311: Teaching Adolescent Literature
      • C&I 313: Secondary Disciplinary Literacy
    • Instructional Coaching >
      • Foundations of Coaching
      • Assessment Analysis
      • Practicum in Student-Centered Coaching
    • Freshman Composition
  • In the Classroom
    • Engaging Digital Literacies
    • Collaborating
    • Resources
  • Blog
  • About
    • CV

Representing our Core Beliefs

12/22/2018

 
​One of the culminating activities of our Coaching Practicum course is the creation of a one-page document to articulate central Coaching Belief Statements. In the past, this assignment has taken a traditional, text-based format. As we hoped for this document to serve an authentic purpose at participant sites, we wondered if a visual representation might better support these aims. Using a variety of different technology tools, our students created visually-appealing belief statement representations that pushed them to clearly and succinctly communicate their vision for coaching. But for every gain this format offered, we had to weigh corresponding losses.
Picture
Picture
As with all writing activities, transitioning to more of a multimodal representation offered affordances and limitations to the traditional print version of this assignment. Overall, participants were split down the middle in regards to the approach they took. To sum up our observations of the two forms:
  • Traditional Print Format...offered deeper insights. In general, writers had more space and they used it to better integrate citations and applications in support of their beliefs. This is not surprising, and in fact, is an observation that persists across genre and purpose of multimodal texts I've assigned in the past. 
  • Multimodal Format...was more engaging to review. If the purpose is merely to communicate information, the print format told a much more detailed story. However, if the purpose is to engage a broader audience to understand the underlying vision and guiding principles of a coaching model, the added design elements make this option a clear winner. Of course the distinction does lie in purpose and therefore audience, and this was something that writers determined on their own. 
  • Traditional Print Format...grounded beliefs in research. These submissions not only made more connections to research but used them to justify the purposes of coaching. Oftentimes, this led to more explicit statements about overarching coaching goals related to equity.
  • Multimodal Format...highlighted beliefs that were more akin to qualities and characteristics rather than actionable practices. Perhaps as a result of the departure from research, these beliefs were more likely to read as one-word values (honesty) rather than complex sentences. This happened in multiple instances, which really surprised us! Perhaps the less formalized nature of the multimodal text elicited a less formalized notion of belief statement, but these examples clearly contradicted the expressed requirements for the assignment. In the end, we adapted the assignment rubric in light of the expressive qualities we were noticing in this form of writing. But this is something we will want to return to in the future!

Comments are closed.

    This Blog

    Wonderings on teaching. learning. and everything in between.

    Archives

    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    October 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    June 2016
    May 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013

    Categories

    All
    Authentic Assessment
    Blended Learning
    Children's Literature
    Digital Literacies
    Ed Tech
    Educational Reforms
    For Consideration
    For Inspiration
    Informational Literacies
    Instructional Coaching
    Instructional Design
    Online Learning
    Reading Instruction
    Supervision & Feedback
    TeachingELA
    Writing Instruction

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Research
    • Teachology 101
    • Technology Showcase
  • Teaching
    • Elementary Education >
      • EDLA 261: Foundations of Literacy
      • EDUC 420: Teaching Elementary Reading (PK-3)
      • C&I 369: Teaching ELA
      • C&I 309: Literacy Across the Curriculum
      • C&I 463: Student Teaching Seminar
      • C&I 373: Practicum III
      • C&I 367: Practicum I
    • Secondary Education >
      • English 311: Teaching Adolescent Literature
      • C&I 313: Secondary Disciplinary Literacy
    • Instructional Coaching >
      • Foundations of Coaching
      • Assessment Analysis
      • Practicum in Student-Centered Coaching
    • Freshman Composition
  • In the Classroom
    • Engaging Digital Literacies
    • Collaborating
    • Resources
  • Blog
  • About
    • CV